Wednesday, January 19, 2022

    Latest Posts

    The road to disastrous biometric data collection is paved with good intentions – TechCrunch

    Biometric data collection planned over the last few months has been accelerating quite enthusiastically. If you’re not worried about it, you should.

    In fact, it sounds ridiculous, more I was more worried than usual. After all, commercial biometric data collection has undergone an astonishing degree of normalization over the last decade. The idea that Apple scans your fingerprints every day sounded amazing. Here’s how to unlock bank apps and laptops. Of course, unless you use your face to unlock it. It has become mainstream.

    Because it is especially convenient, we have adopted functions such as Face ID and thumbprint scan. There is no problem with the passcode.

    Businesses and businesses are aware of this, and convenience is currently the two most commonly cited reasons for adopting biometric data collection. The other is public safety, which will be explained later. Rapid biometric scans are said to make things faster and easier.

    To save time, many elementary schools across the UK have recently Implemented face scan for lunch payments..Some schools have decided to suspend the program after data privacy professionals and parents Pushed back.. They argued that convenience wasn’t worth the price of accumulating an entire database of toddler faces stored on a server somewhere. And they are right.

    Music for your ears, palm prints for your tickets

    In September of this year, US ticket company AXS announced a flagship program to use Red Rocks Amphitheatre’s Amazon One palm print scanner as an optional alternative to printing or mobile concert tickets (Plans to expand to additional venues in the coming months).The decision was met Immediate resistance It came from both privacy experts and musicians and was not the first flash point for biometric data collection within the live music industry.

    In 2019, major promoters Live Nation and AEG (coordinating major festivals such as Coachella) Withdraw from plans to invest and implement facial recognition technology at concerts After public protests from fans and artists.

    However, the dispute over the use of biometrics during live entertainment is far from resolved. When the coronavirus pandemic returned professional sports executives who depended on full stadiums to the drawing board, their new plans often incorporated a large amount of facial recognition. The face replaces the ticket, which makes everyone on the surface safer from the virus.

    These executives are fixed. The Dutch soccer team AFCAjax is trying to reinstall the pilot’s facial recognition program, which was originally suspended by data protection regulators.Henck Van Larn, Chief Innovation Officer of Ajax’s home field Amsterdam Arena Quoted in The Wall Street Journal “Hopefully, we’ll take advantage of this coronavirus pandemic to change the rules. Coronavirus is a bigger enemy. [any threat to] privacy. “

    This is a terrible reason because the risks posed to our privacy are never mitigated or mitigated by our risk to the virus.

    In the same article, Shaun Moore, CEO of facial recognition supplier Trueface, talks with professional sports executives by avoiding the delivery of credentials, citing the risk of virus infection when scanning barcodes on tickets. He explained that he was overwhelmingly concerned.

    This is not straightforward. You don’t have to be an epidemiologist. If a large number of people scream or cheer next to each other at the main event, it may not be a temporary masked interaction when the agent scans the ticket. As the safety debate collapses, so does the useful debate. The simple fact is that replacing mobile tickets with palm prints does not improve our lives exponentially and meaningfully. These extra 5 seconds are an important point.

    It’s interesting to see Van Larn speak directly about using pandemics to protect privacy and negate concerns. But his reasoning is horrifying and flawed.

    Yes, the coronavirus is a real threat, but it is not an “enemy”. It is not materialized and has no motive. It’s a virus. It’s out of human control. In insurance terms, it is “the act of God.” And it is used to justify something under human control: a significant increase in biometric data collection under the guise of public safety or convenience.

    Public security and free society

    Public security often causes increased biometric monitoring. August, U.S. lawmaker Introduced mandate To do this, automakers need to incorporate passive technology into their new cars to prevent drunk drivers from starting the vehicle. Its “passive” technology can be anything from eye scans and alcohol detectors to infrared sensors that test BAC levels through the skin.

    Indeed, this is a seemingly noble cause with good motivation. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that nearly 10,000 people die each year from drunk driving.European Commission List similar numbers in the EU..

    But where does all that data go? Where is it stored? Who is it sold to, and what are they going to do with it? The privacy risk is too great.

    The pandemic has removed many obstacles that hinder the adoption of large amounts of biometric data collection. If allowed to continue in this way, the consequences would be disastrous for civil liberties. The intensity of surveillance is increasing at record speeds, and governments and for-profit companies are aware of the most private characteristics of our lives and bodies.

    Mobile tickets are well monitored. After all, it notifies the system that you have entered the venue at the exact time. If it’s not broken, don’t fix it! And don’t add biometric data collection just because you can do it under the precarious guise of not spreading bacteria.

    Minimize biometric data as much as possible. For example, when it comes to basic human rights and civil liberties, given the terrible records of these companies, it’s not enough to avoid providing biometric data, especially to Google and Amazon.

    A small company that has nothing to do with your typical tech giant may seem less threatening, but don’t be fooled. The moment Amazon or Google acquires the company, they get biometric data for you and everyone else with it. And we are back where we started.

    A safe society does not have to be a closely monitored society. We have built an increasingly safe and healthy society for centuries without the use of a single video camera. And beyond safety, such detailed and personalized rigorous surveillance is the secret to the death of a society that respects the freedom of its citizens.

    Maybe that’s what this all comes down to. A free and open society is not without risk. This is arguably one of the main beliefs of Western political thought since the Enlightenment. These risks are far more favorable than the risks of living in a closely monitored society.

    In other words, we never get off the biometric grid we are heading to. It’s time to stop sliding by regulating and eliminating the collection of unwanted biometric data, especially when commercial companies are involved.

    The road to disastrous biometric data collection is paved with good intentions – TechCrunch Source link The road to disastrous biometric data collection is paved with good intentions – TechCrunch

    The post The road to disastrous biometric data collection is paved with good intentions – TechCrunch appeared first on California News Times.

    Source link

    Latest Posts

    Don't Miss

    Stay in touch

    To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.