The Supreme Court said the Roe v. Wade case is history, but it is not without a small number of judges who support the majority by giving up its responsibilities so much.
The judge refused to hear an objection to Texas’s abortion law by a margin of five to four. This makes it essentially illegal to have an abortion after the 6th week of pregnancy. And rape and incest are no exception. And anyone in the United States can sue someone who promotes an abortion after the sixth week and raise $ 10,000.
The judges who formed the majority were predictable … Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito And three Trump appointers- Kavanaugh, Gorsuch When Barrett.. Mr. Trump said he was choosing a judge to overturn Rho, and his choice was true.
The majority said the case was too complex to make a swift decision … presenting a new issue. The fact is … Texas law is undoubtedly in honest conflict with the Roe v. Wade case. Judges hated the enforcement mechanism that it was the civilians, not the state itself, who were responsible for the enforcement of the law. But the reality is … the basic rules of abortion in Texas fly in the face of Roe. Nevertheless, the judge chose to punt.
The dissenting opinion was blisters.Justice Sonia Sotomayor He added that the decision was “superb” and that the majority chose to “buy their heads in the sand.” She calls the law “clearly unconstitutional.”
“In effect, the Texas State Council has represented the citizens of the state as bounty hunters and is offering prize money for civil prosecution of their neighbors’ medical procedures,” Sotomayor said.
This non-decision sets the stage for the upcoming major confrontation in which the Mississippi Abortion Prohibition Act challenges the Roe v. Wade case head-on. The Supreme Court’s view of Texas law seems to be a direct precursor to Law.
Supreme Court Refuses to Block Texas Anti-Abortion Law Source link Supreme Court Refuses to Block Texas Anti-Abortion Law