“Personal, Persuasive, Inflammatory”: Epstein-Linked Court Struggle Soars | New York

Date:

WGhislaine Maxwell’s criminal conviction is on the way to appeal, and Virginia Robert’s civil proceedings against Prince Andrew are another noticeable proceeding involving convicted sex traffickers. I caught up with the proceedings on evidence and testimony recording. Jeffrey Epstein I work through the New York court system.

It’s also dragging some of the elite’s biggest names new York It sends a shock wave to society, in this case the scarce world of finance in Manhattan.

According to Leon Black, one of New York’s wealthiest men with an estimated net worth of $ 13.2 billion. Bloomberg Billionaires Index, And has been involved in a fierce dispute with Guzerganieva, former Apollo Global Management chief and chairman of the Museum of Modern Art (Moma) in New York. Engage in sexual activity with Epstein.

In recent months, the dispute between 70-year-old Black and Ganieva has escalated in a series of proceedings swirling to draw numbers from some of Manhattan’s most powerful social circles, with accusations more serious than ever. did. ..

Ganieva’s defamation, intentional mental distress, gender violence and the first allegations of retaliation were first revealed in a tweet earlier last year, and Black went to Epstein for tax advice and financial services. Following the exposure of payments of only about $ 158 million. Get off from Apollo and Moma.

In June, Ganieva sued Black in the New York State Court above, forcing him to sign a 2015 nondisclosure agreement for a six-and-a-half-year relationship, alleging that he tried to force him, alleging defamation. .. He threatened to go public in their relationship.

Black’s lawyer said Ganieva’s proceedings were a “fiction job” and paid only to ensure her silence about their relationship.

Black said he had rejected Ganieva’s first $ 100 million request, but reached an agreement to allow a $ 1 million loan and pay $ 100,000 a month for 15 years in exchange for a nondisclosure agreement. He also gave her $ 2.75 million to help her get a UK visa or passport.

Now the controversy is getting even more intense.

After Ganieva accused him of sexual abuse, Black not only refused Ganieva’s accusations and counterclaims in the New York civil court, but also had the same jurisdiction as she sued him. He filed a US federal lawsuit under the plot and assault law commonly used to arrest mobs. Drug trafficker.

Ganieva’s complaint was “shameful,” and Black’s lawyer argued in a federal proceeding, stating that his relationship with Ganieva was “regrettable,” but her allegations “misleaded the New York State Court. It was fraudulently designed to be (more directly) derogatory. ” And to bully Mr. Black and add to the exorbitant payments he has already made to prevent Mr. Ganieva from further destroying him. “

In the proceedings, Black alleged that Wigdor’s Ganieva and her lawyer were at the forefront of a civil settlement with a man accused of sexual misconduct during the #MeToo era. Destroy him and his reputation.

Black’s lawyer said in the complaint: To destroy the reputation of Mr. Black and his business. To undermine his career. To interfere with his business relationship. And to express concern about the leadership of the company he has created and nurtured over the last 30 years. “

Black’s lawyer in a federal lawsuit is Susan Estrich, a legal scholar who became known as the manager of Michael Dukakis’ 1988 presidential election and later defended former Fox News executive Roger Ailes from sexual harassment claims.

In a court document filed in Manhattan, Estrich called her lawyers in Ganieva and Wigdor “trying to get more from Mr. Black or destroy him in the process” of a widespread extortion program. He states that he is the performer.

According to Black’s lawyer, the defendant “used mail and telegraph to trick and manipulate the media and courts to organize Mr Black’s assassination at all levels.”

However, Estrich also has a deep pocket for conspiracy to “face the millionaire directly” with an unnamed conspirator or “John Does”, including two “defects” or PR specialists. Claims to include supporters.

Black’s lawyer also said he would look into who was paying for Wigdor in Ganieva’s proceedings against him. Ganieva agreed to pay Wigdor 38% of the money she received from Black, according to an agreement filed in the case.

Ganieva and Wigdor have denied their claims.

Wigdor called the proceeding “flirty as a matter of law,” and “knowing that blacks and his lawyers have no evidence of support or sincere grounds for their unnatural and flawed” Rico. ” I have filed a petition for dismissal. [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act] And the claim of “defamation”. “

A financier’s lawyer said a modified complaint would be filed within the next few days, further revealing allegations of conspiracy against blacks.

Recent court disclosures provide clues as to what direction they may be heading.

Black’s lawyer demanded that the presiding judge grant access to private records involving some of New York’s most prominent businessmen. After Black’s payment to Epstein was revealed.

Harris’s lawyer, Jonathan Rosen, described Black’s hint as “desperate and ridiculous,” denying Harris’ relationship with Ganieva or her lawyer.

“Harris has nothing to do with the serious problems Black is facing. Other statements and implications are at best unhindered,” Rosen told The Guardian.

Others included in Black’s Rico Action are Stephen Rubenstein, a public relations executive in New York whose clients include Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, and Donald Trump. Michael Rubin, co-owner of the NBA’s Philadelphia 76ers sports product billionaire and Harris.

According to court documents, Black’s lawyer wanted to know that Rubenstein had contacted nine nominated individuals, including Ganieva, her lawyer, and a reporter. Rubenstein and Rubin are also opposed to being dragged into the case.

Rubenstein’s lawyer said in a court filing: [a bystander to a lawsuit] At the whim of the parties to the proceedings, all phone records can be subject to a subpoena requesting. “

Jean Kristensen, a Wigdor lawyer nominated in the proceedings, believes Black has filed a new proceeding in federal court instead of filing a counterclaim against the financial firm at the request of Ganieva’s former state court. increase.

“He’s basically just trying to intimidate our clients by filing another proceeding against her,” Kristensen told the Guardian. “It’s a tactic to create a potential split between her and her lawyer. He’s hitting her from as many aspects as possible. It’s pretty bad.”

Bennett Garshman, a former prosecutor at the New York State Anti-Corruption Office, who teaches law at Pace University, said he couldn’t think of another sexual harassment case that was returned to another court in Rico’s case. ..

“This is far beyond what you usually see,” Gershman told the Guardian.

“I have never seen a proceeding party file a Rico proceeding against a woman who thought she had settled at $ 1 million a year. It was personal, compelling, and inflamed. It’s out of control in that it’s. US proceedings are often hostile and controversial, but this goes far beyond that. They point their teeth and nails at it. “

“Personal, Persuasive, Inflammatory”: Epstein-Linked Court Struggle Soars | New York

Source link “Personal, Persuasive, Inflammatory”: Epstein-Linked Court Struggle Soars | New York

The post “Personal, Persuasive, Inflammatory”: Epstein-Linked Court Struggle Soars | New York appeared first on Eminetra.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

The ADL Murder Report That Cried ‘White Supremacist’

Guest post by James Varney, with permission from RealClearInvestigations In...

Dollar Stores Keep Passing the Buck

Dollar stores are riding inflation like pros. Both ...

Macy’s: do not bet on revenge spending boost to last

Who is afraid of inflation? Not the average...

Broadcom broadens tech with VMware deal

This article is an onsite version of our #techFT...