NS Facebook whistleblowerFrancis Haugen testified before the US Congress on Tuesday, painting a disastrous picture of the tech giant’s policy.
Howgen’s appearance in front of US Senate The latest attention-grabbing hearing about Big Tech proved a substantive and insightful session that is certain to have a lasting impact.
One of the most useful Big Tech hearings ever
US lawmakers held several notable hearings on the practices of prominent technology companies, including: FacebookAlthough Google and Amazon have been in the last few years, they rarely see testimony from witnesses who have so much expertise and so many practical suggestions to improve tech companies. This may have been the most useful Big Tech hearing ever.
Haugen’s testimony reflects concerns from activists and researchers that Facebook systematically promotes harmful content and promotes engagement at all costs. “The choices made within Facebook are disastrous for our children, our public security, our privacy, and our democracy,” she said.
Impact of social media on children
The hearing on Tuesday followed a report by The Wall Street Journal, which revealed that Facebook had set aside its own investigation into the negative effects of Instagram apps on children. Haugen told lawmakers that Facebook is deliberately targeting teens, including children under the age of 13. Facebook Instagram Kids, a platform for young users, will be suspended.
Just last week, Facebook security officer Antigone Davis Responded Answers questions about the company’s targeting younger users by emphasizing that children under the age of 13 are not allowed on Facebook.
Call for new regulations
Haugen argued that Facebook needed more regulation and painted a company that lacked the staffing, expertise, and transparency needed to make meaningful changes.
“Facebook is stuck in a difficult cycle of hiring,” she says. “It causes project staff shortages and scandals, which makes employment difficult.”
Senator seemed to agree
Senators have repeatedly compared Facebook to big tobacco, suggesting that the platform may have regulations similar to those seen for tobacco in the past. “Facebook is like a big cigarette, and its first cigarette attracts young children,” said Senator Ed Markey. “Parliament will take action. We no longer allow your company to harm our children, our families and our democracy,” Marquee added.
Spotlight Facebook’s role abroad
Haugen spotlighted the impact of Facebook’s non-US policy decisions and said the company did not devote the same amount of research and resources to false alarms and hate speech on non-English content. “Facebook is investing more in users who make more money, even if the risks are not evenly distributed based on profitability,” she said.
According to Haugen, 87% of false alarm spending on Facebook is English content, and only 9% of users speak English. That resource gap fuels violence in places like Ethiopia, she said.
And about Facebook’s lack of transparency
Haugen also said Facebook lacked transparency and called on lawmakers to demand more insight into the company’s investigation.She is on Facebook August decision Revoke access to platform data on the spread of false information about vaccines by researchers at New York University.
“fact Facebook Even the basic transparency is scary, so we can’t block researchers asking nasty questions, demonstrating the need for congressional oversight, “she said.
An array of possible next steps
Haugen has proposed some steps that can be taken to regulate Facebook, which will definitely be discussed in the coming weeks.
These measures include an independent government agency with a former engineer who understands how the algorithm works, changing the news feed in chronological order rather than ranking the content with an opaque algorithm, on Facebook. This includes requesting that the internal investigation be published.
She encouraged the company to accept help from outsiders, sympathized with Facebook and admitted, “These are really, really difficult questions.”
Facebook did not immediately respond to the Guardian’s request for comment. However, Facebook spokeswoman Lena Pietch told The New York Times that the company disagrees with Hogen’s characteristics. “Nevertheless, we agree with one thing. It’s time to start creating standard rules for the Internet. It’s been 25 years since the rules for the Internet were updated, and the industry is a legislator. It’s time for Congress to act instead of expecting to make social decisions that belong to. “
“Parliament will take action”: Key points from interviews with Facebook whistleblowers | Facebook
Source link “Parliament will take action”: Key points from interviews with Facebook whistleblowers | Facebook
The post “Parliament will take action”: Key points from interviews with Facebook whistleblowers | Facebook appeared first on Eminetra.