There is a growing call to abolish the controversial Trump era initiative. Universities in the United StatesCritics say it brought about racial profiling and undermined technical competitiveness.
In a letter sent to the Ministry of Justice, 177 faculty members across 40 faculties at Stanford University have requested the US government to suspend the operation of the “China Initiative.” They argue that the program undermines academic freedom by racially profiling and unfairly targeting Chinese scholars.
The letter follows a researcher’s acquittal last week accused of concealing a relationship with a federal judge. China While American taxpayers are receiving funding grants.
“We understand that it is important to address concerns about Chinese government-approved activities, including intellectual property theft and economic espionage,” wrote a scholar at Stanford University. “But we believe the Chinese initiative deviates significantly from its alleged mission, which undermines the competitiveness of US research and technology and fosters biases that raise concerns about racial profiling. “
On Thursday, a federal judge Tennessee Anming Hu, a Chinese nanotechnology expert at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, was accused of concealing her relationship with Beijing while applying for research funding to work on the NASA project. The judge said the US government did not prove the claim.
“Given that there is no evidence that the defendant was aware of such a broad interpretation of NASA’s China funding restrictions, even if the court looked at all the evidence from the most favorable point of view for the government. Defendants plan to deceive Nasa, “said Judge Thomas Varlan of the US District Court. Judgment on page 52..
“I’m disappointed with the results, but I respect the court’s decision,” the Justice Department said in response to the decision, according to US media. Hu’s lawyer, Phil Lomonaco, said scholars are currently focusing on recovering his tenure at the University of Tennessee.
“Many universities must have learned from the experience that professors were forced to endure,” Romonaco said. “The Justice Department needs to take a step back and reassess their approach of investigating Chinese professors at US universities. They are not all spies.”
“There is a better way”
The high-profile trial came after a series of arrests of US-based researchers accused of not properly disclosing research in China in recent years. After the jury’s impasse, President Hu’s case ended suspiciously in June. “For two years, FBI agents have used false information to justify spying on President Hu and his son,” admitted. Local news report..
The Trump era China initiative began in 2018. In justifying such an operation, the Justice Department said: On that website: “The Ministry of Justice’s China initiative reflects the strategic priority of countering China’s national security threats and strengthens the president’s overall national security strategy.” We have published a list of charges – the latest is May 14th.
But while critics say the United States needs to protect national security, such programs targeting ethnic groups as a whole will end up discriminating against Asian Americans, especially Americans from China. say.
On July 30, 90 members of the US Congress asked the Justice Department to investigate what they called “repeated and illegally targeted Asian individuals on suspicion of spying.” In a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland..
Last week, Democrat Ted Lieu Requested the Justice Ministry to apologize to Hu.. “You should stop discriminating against Asians. You should investigate your prosecutor to engage in what looks like racial profiling. If President Hu’s name was Smith, you should do this. I wouldn’t have filed a lawsuit, “he wrote.
A series of recent calls have been triggered by increasing violence against Asians in the United States. According to last month’s FBI annual reportThe number of reported crimes against decent people in Asia increased by 70% last year to a total of 274.
Margaret Lewis of Seaton Hall Law School in New Jersey is calling on the US government to rethink its approach to research safety. “I understand that we need to be concerned about the actions of the Chinese government to encourage violations of US law, but the United States should first not engage in rhetoric that encourages heterogeneity and racism.
“I’m worried that people with certain characteristics may be suspected,” she said. “Don’t pretend you’re not worried about Beijing, but there’s a better way to do it. Getting rid of the name is the first step.”
In criticism of racial profiling, scholars urge to abolish the “China initiative” of the Trump era | US Universities
Source link In criticism of racial profiling, scholars urge to abolish the “China initiative” of the Trump era | US Universities