San Jose, CA — Seven years after leaving Theranos, Adam Rosendorf The downfall of blood test startups.. In just four days of testimony, the former lab director became the most important witness to date in the Elizabeth Holmes criminal fraud trial.
Dr. Rosendorf’s testimony links the Theranos issue directly to Mr Holmes, supporting prosecutors’ allegations that the company’s founders are trying to trick patients and investors into the Theranos technology.
“I frequently discussed laboratory concerns with Elizabeth,” he testified, and she was often copied to emails discussing the issue.
One and a half days later Question from the prosecutorDr. Rosendorf faced positive questions this week From Holmes’ defense team.. He is expected to face another day’s cross-examination in federal court in San Jose on Tuesday. There, Holmes is being tried for a conspiracy attempting 10 wire frauds and 2 wire frauds.
Her lawyer described her as a tiny sin Trust others And run the failed business. Theranos was closed in 2018 during regulatory scrutiny and criminal accusations.
Dr. Rosendorf served as lab director from April 2013 to his resignation in November 2014, ensuring the accuracy of the company’s blood tests and responding to customer complaints if technology fails on a daily basis. Assisted.
From that perch, Dr. Rosendorf said he personally witnessed a failure of Theranos’s boasting technology. The company said investors can make hundreds of diagnoses with a few drops of blood from a finger puncture wound. The company often used traditional machines to run tests rather than proprietary technology.
Dr. Rosendorf testified that Holmes knew that the company’s device would produce inaccurate results, but nevertheless urged Theranos to deploy the technology for real patients.
On November 14, 2014, just before leaving the company, Dr. Rosendorf sent an email directly to Mr. Holmes. [SIC] What’s happening at this company right now? He asked to remove his name from the lab license. This reduces legal liability. “I feel pressure to guarantee results that I’m not confident about.”
Five days later, Holmes replied, “I was very sad and disappointed to see this from you.” She said she was unaware of his concerns and wrote: With confidence. “
Dr. Rosendorf told the jury that she felt her reaction dishonest because she had warned her about the problem in the past.
During Friday’s interrogation, Dr. Rosendorf appeared to have raised Holmes’ lawyer as evidence that executives, including Holmes, did not, the month before leaving to discuss various blood test issues. Dismiss his concern that he had met with senior management. According to an email sent to the jury, he was asked if he wanted to have a follow-up meeting and told executive Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani that it wouldn’t be necessary.
Born in South Africa, Dr. Rosendorf came to the United States in 1993 and attended the School of Medicine in New York to become an expert in clinical pathology. He explained that it meant diagnosing the disease in the laboratory. Prior to joining Theranos in April 2013, he was a lab director at the University of Pittsburgh Children’s Hospital.
He told the jury how he believed in his next participation
When he started working for Theranos, but was finally disillusioned, he was worried that the company might have been more interested in public relations than patient safety.
By the time he left the company, he had saved some Theranos communications in his personal email account. He testified in case he needed them later to tell others what he saw.
Share your thoughts
What’s the most interesting thing about Theranos trials? Join the conversation below.
Dr. Rosendorf spoke with a Wall Street Journal reporter in 2015 before publishing an article revealing that Theranos fingerstick lab tests are unreliable and often use traditional machines instead. I said I did. He only publicly revealed himself as a source in court this week.
Holmes’ lawyer, Lance Wade, has been asking Dr. Rosendorf longer than the prosecutor and is expected to continue next week. Cross-examination was sometimes hostile, but for a long time it dived deep into scientific details.
Dr. Rosendorf was reprimanded by the judge for answering questions carefully, sometimes parsing words to give unanswered answers, talking about the questioner, and going beyond the scope of the question.
As one such example, Dr. Rosendorff recalls Theranos’ salary of $ 240,000, “given the quality problems and risks of Theranos, the risks and problems of professionals,” which has been insufficient for the past seven years. I said there is. Or the eight years of legal costs he had to pay.
Write to Saralandazzo firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2021 DowJones & Company, Inc. all rights reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Former Theranos Lab Director Appears as Witness to Central Prosecution
Source link Former Theranos Lab Director Appears as Witness to Central Prosecution
The post Former Theranos Lab Director Appears as Witness to Central Prosecution appeared first on Eminetra.