FBI Director Chris Ray faces new scrutiny of the Bureau’s handling of background checks in 2018. Brett Kavanaugh, Includes allegations that the FBI lacks the authority to further investigate candidates for the Supreme Court at the time.
At the heart of the new questions Ray faces when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee later this week is the 2010 Memorandum of Understanding. FBI He recently said that the agency’s ability to investigate further allegations of illegal activity has been limited.
As a result of careful reading of the memorandum published in court records at the request of the Information Disclosure Law, it is not clear whether the claim is accurate.
FBI was called to Investigate allegations of sexual misconduct Against Kavanaugh during the 2018 Senate confirmation process after being accused of assault by Christine Blasey Ford, a professor who knew Kavanaugh when he was in high school. He also faced other accusations, including exposing himself to a classmate at Yale University called Deborah Ramirez. Kavanaugh denied both accusations.
The FBI completed Kavanaugh’s background check four days later and did not interview either Brazyford or Kavanaugh. FBI too Disclosure to the Senate in June this year – Two years after the first question was asked – Received 4,500 tips from the public Having shared all “related tips” with the White House adviser at that time during the background check. It is not clear if those tips have been investigated so far.
In a letter to two senators, the Sheldon White House and Christopher Koons, the FBI authorizes the 2010 MOU to “unilaterally conduct further investigations unless instructed by the requester.” He said he didn’t have it. In other words, the FBI stated that explicit instructions from the Trump White House are needed to conduct further investigations under the existing 2010 guidelines on how such investigations should be conducted. rice field.
However, a 2010 MOU parental investigation signed by then Attorney General Eric Holder and White House adviser Robert Bauer clearly revealed that the FBI had restrictions on how to do it. Is not … Research.
A memorandum of understanding issued in court in 2019 as part of Buzzfeed’s proceedings against the U.S. government also explicitly states that the White House has the authority to set process parameters for the investigation. not. The MOU seems to suggest that the White House had the authority to limit the FBI to investigate specific issues and questions.
Ray may face scrutiny as to why the information specific to the alleged sexual misconduct was not fully investigated. Senator who witnessed an event similar to what he was told by Ramirez.
The Stier account was never examined by the FBI.
In a statement to the Guardians, Sheldon White House, a Rhode Island Democrat who has led the Democrats’ request for answers to the survey, said: We limited that authority to the FBI and investigated fraud. Now that we have an MOU, it’s even harder to understand the station’s excuse for ignoring the trusted information it receives. Director Ray should be ready to answer my question about this episode. I won’t stop asking until he answers. “
The FBI declined to comment.
Ray testified in the Senate on Wednesday at a hearing focusing on handling the FBI’s investigation into Larry Nassar, a convicted sex offender who served as a team doctor for the U.S. Women’s National Gymnastics Team for 18 years. To do. Simone Biles, a US gymnast and Olympic gold medalist, also testifies.
Kavanaugh confirmed his lifetime appointment in court in a 50-48 vote on October 6, 2018, helping to consolidate a conservative majority into a strong body.
FBI Director Faces New Scrutiny of Brett Kavanaugh’s Investigation | FBI
Source link FBI Director Faces New Scrutiny of Brett Kavanaugh’s Investigation | FBI