Saturday, January 22, 2022

    Latest Posts

    Big Tech has an IP piracy problem – TechCrunch

    US International Trade Commission Dominate on January 6th Google violated Sonos’ patented innovation in wireless speaker technology. This may sound like an ambiguous legal decision on a complex battle for intellectual property. But it supports problems that threaten America’s innovation economy and its international economic competitiveness.

    problem? Intellectual property theft.

    A few years ago, big tech companies like Google decided to make a profit by stealing the intellectual property of small businesses rather than buying or licensing them. Google, Apple, Samsung and others have tens of billions of dollars and even hundreds of billions of dollars in cash, and you don’t have to pay attorneys’ fees, legal fees, or even damages for this theft.Google reported $ 142 billion In cash at the bank. This is far more than most companies make on gross profit annually.

    Therefore, Big Tech will adopt what it needs. Then use the scorched earth tactics to defeat the complaints of IP owners. It drags proceedings over the years and imposes enormous legal costs on intellectual property owners seeking justice. Many IP owners do not even file proceedings. They know that trying to legitimately protect theirs is devastating and self-defeating.

    Simply put, Big Tech benefits from stealing IP. Court costs and potential damages, even if issued after years of proceedings, are insignificant.

    Several companies have counterattacked and the results support this predatory infringement. The story of Google’s abuse of Sonos is one of the more compelling stories.

    Sonos is a classic American success story, and Google’s technology piracy is a tragedy. Sonos started as a disruptive startup in 2005 with innovative patented innovations in wireless speakers. In 2013, we signed a license agreement with Google when Google agreed to integrate its music service, Google Play Music, with Sonos speakers.

    Simply put, Big Tech benefits from stealing IP. Court costs and potential damages, even if issued after years of proceedings, are insignificant. Adam Mosov

    However, Google only used this transaction to access Sonos technology. Soon, we began manufacturing unique devices using Sonos technology, such as Sonos speakers and speakers and other audio equipment that directly compete with other products on the market.

    Google was unable to cover Sonos’ development costs and was able to subsidize new products and services with huge profits from the search engine business. Therefore, Google has fallen below the price of Sonos. This is a common business practice of patent pirates.

    Sonos first tried to negotiate a contract with Google and asked Google to pay a license for the pirated technology from Sonos. Google held up for years, its profits swelled, and it dragged negotiations while Sonos lost more and more money. Seven years later, Sonos had no choice but to defend that right in court. Sonos sued Google in 2020.

    Sonos has also sued Google at the International Trade Commission. This special court can move faster than a regular court in banning infringing imports. But it cannot reward damages.

    In August of this year, a judge of the International Trade Commission ruled that Google actually infringed five Sonos patents. Last week, the Commission reaffirmed this decision. Google still calls Sonos’s claim “flirty” and promises to keep fighting.

    This is just one of the notable examples of Big Tech’s illegal use of other people’s patented technology. It is now very common to be named predatory infringement. Legal scholars and policy makers call it “efficient infringement.” In plain English, this is piracy.

    Unfortunately, Big Tech has attacked the US patent system to further support piracy. For millions, Google and other companies have urged Congress and regulators to weaken and eliminate patents, pushing the system against innovators. For example, they created a “patent troll” Boogeyman and slandered patent owners who sued them for infringement. As if the problem was not their own theft, but the victim’s counterattack.

    Washington must act to protect innovators and creators who rely on patents as a major driver of the US innovation economy.Parliament needs to reintroduce and enact bipartisan Stronger patent law.. The law will rebalance the patent system by lobbying for Big Tech to create and reforming some of the legal rules and institutions that are key to predatory infringing tactical practices.

    Sonos’ legal victory over Google confirms policy issues and what lawyers have been talking about for years. Big Tech’s predatory infringement is a 21st century piracy, and Sonos is just one of many victims. Washington can and should help end this piracy.

    Big Tech has an IP piracy problem – TechCrunch Source link Big Tech has an IP piracy problem – TechCrunch

    The post Big Tech has an IP piracy problem – TechCrunch appeared first on California News Times.

    Source link

    Latest Posts

    Don't Miss

    Stay in touch

    To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.